Social Lausanne is a starting point for correcting  reality in  region

Sihanouk Dibo affirmed that the meeting held in Lausanne could be the prelude to the arrangement of the Kurdish house, and that social Lausanne is not intended to accept the idea of national Lausanne, but rather to start from it to correct the reality in which we live.

Social Lausanne is a starting point for correcting  reality in  region
2 August, 2023   00:33
QAMISHLO, MOHAMMED ABDO

On the 100th anniversary of the Lausanne Treaty, a historic meeting was organized on July 22. The co-chair of the Relations Office of the Democratic Union Party, Sihanouk Dibo, noted that the meeting reflected a general societal desire for all the Kurdish and Kurdish people’s daughters and sons to declare their rejection of the Lausanne National Treaty concluded in 1923. .

Sihanouk Dibo explained that the Treaty of Lausanne reflected the agendas of the countries of the region and contradicted the true aspirations of their peoples, and he said: "It separates products in the region by imposing the form of the nation-state that came as an intersection of the interests and agendas of the dominant countries at the time, and here we mean France, Britain and many of the axis countries that have the preference to achieve victory in the First World War.

Sihanouk Dibo emphasized that the Treaty of Lausanne came as the opposite embodiment of the aspirations of the peoples of the entire region, led by the Kurds, and the period preceding Lausanne can be considered in the Sykes-Picot maps or the Cairo conference held in March 1921, and the consequences of that through the agreements of Ankara and the French mandate, which is tantamount to limiting and a declared attempt to annihilate the Kurdish cause and the Kurdish people to determine their own destiny.

Lausanne Conference pave the way for the arrangement of the Kurdish house

Dibo pointed out that despite the existence of visions that may not be consistent in many political issues between all the Kurdish parties, but in general everyone rejects the Treaty of Lausanne, and said: "The conference that was held in Lausanne can be described as the prelude to the arrangement of the Kurdish house and the unification of the Kurdish position, and at the forefront These issues, how will there be a sustainable and just solution to the Kurdish issue in its four parts?

Dibo believes that the Kurds are leading a process of democratic transition in the Middle East, and he said: "The Kurds who were not affected by the form of the centralized nation-state imposed on the region, which brought with it multiple issues, calamities and disasters at all levels and aspects, are able to follow the path of democracy."

Dibo pointed out that those who are convinced of the thought of the democratic nation introduced by the leader Abdullah Ocalan, embodied this through the Autonomous Administration that was established in North and East Syria, and explained: "So that this idea and embodiment would turn into one of the most important solution equations not only for the Syrian crisis, but for the whole world."

Dibo emphasized that the thought of the democratic nation is transformed into an advanced form and an important and coherent standard for resolving the Syrian crisis. Which is represented by the Autonomous Administration, so we must not fall into the trap of emulating the system of central tyranny, which cannot be reproduced and considered as the true equivalent of the freedom of peoples.

Lausanne social concept to correct the reality of peoples

Sihanouk Dibo touched on the idea of social Lausanne, which was put forward by the leader Abdullah Ocalan in 2009, and said: "Social Lausanne is not intended to accept the idea of national Lausanne, but rather to proceed from it to correct the reality in which we live; the leader Abdullah Ocalan presented pleadings to all the peoples of the region, between Through it, we as the peoples of the Middle East, led by the Kurds, can decide our fate and manage the entire region by stating our geographical realities, and this should not be understood as boycotting others.We emphasize in all our social studies that we are part of the regional environment and we do not wish to impose on us solutions that may be seen by others suitable for us."

Dibo stressed the importance of replacing vocabulary, forms, and structures that appeared in Lausanne 1923, with what is appropriate for the democratic Middle East region, which consists of nationalities, religions, and sects. He said: "We do not recognize that there is a conflict defined on a religious or national basis. The Middle East can be a region." A unified social, political and economic space, and therefore the societal dimension must be taken into account if similar meetings or conferences are held in Lausanne to achieve the democratic transformation that we aim for.

"The Treaty of Sèvres must be put on the scale of critical narrative"

Dibo stressed the need to read the narratives that affect the treaties and agreements that include the region, and largely defined its reality, and became associated with its current problems. He said, "Take, for example, that many politicians and intellectuals indicate that the Treaty of Sevres 1920 came to establish the rights of the Kurdish people, but when placed on the scale of the critical narrative, we find that it reduced Kurdistan to 20% of its real area, and the focus is on 3 vague articles that did not define autonomy or economic.

The co-chair of the Office of Relations in the Democratic Union Party called for the necessity of holding a Kurdish national conference that would show the options that suit the Kurdish people, and that would lead to a just and real solution to the Kurdish issue.

T/ Satt.

ANHA