​​​​​​​Turkey mobilizes .. Syrian researcher confirms: It is danger to Kurds, Arabs

The Syrian crisis entered a new turn after Turkey occupied parts of the Syrian territories on August 24, 2016 through a play in which it tried to delude the world that it was fighting ISIS despite the fact that the Turkish authorities refused to participate in the framework of the international coalition and the use of aviation to bomb ISIS positions and occupied a part from the borderline from Jarabulus in the east to Azaz in the west, and al-Bab in the south.

This occupation which carried out with Russian approval aimed to strike the Democratic Autonomous Administration in al-Jazeera, Kobane and Afrin. The Turkish targets and the Russian collusion with it became clearer by concluding the Ghouta Damascus in exchange for Afrin deal, when the Russian forces withdrew from Afrin in January 2018, and opened the way in front of Turkey to occupy it.

Turkey, which committed war crimes during its attacks on Afrin, began after the occupation to commit crimes against humanity by deliberately targeting the Kurdish people, displacing them from their homes, seizing their property and kidnapping them, and likewise did the same with the Arab people rejecting the Turkish occupation, thus changing the demographics of the region amid international silence.

To this day, the Turkification policy in the occupied territories continues through textbooks, raising flags and pictures, naming the institutions with Turkish names, and recently replacing the Syrian currency with the Turkish one in daily transactions.

The Turkish occupation did not stop there, but it began on October 9, 2019 to launch attacks on Serêkaniyê and Girê Spî regions, and occupied them amid a shameful silence of the United Nations, and to repeat the killings, the intentional displacement, the demographic change and Turkification there.

In conjunction with its recent attacks on Şengal province which was subjected to massacres by ISIS, and Mexmûr refugee camp in southern Kurdistan, the Turkish occupation state began to mobilize its forces and mercenaries in the countryside of Tel Tamr, Zarkan and Ain Issa, and our correspondents confirmed the arrival of reinforcements of the occupation army to the villages of Alia and al-Manajir in the countryside of Tel Tamr and villages near Zarkan and Ain Issa.

Turkey's threats constitute the existence or non-existence pattern

In this context, the Syrian writer and researcher Ahmed al-Derzi said that the Turkish threats to the region are the most serious threats at all and are considered “the pattern of existence or non-existence,” stressing that the attacks do not target one component but rather target Syria in general. He said: “Turkey does not target the Kurds themselves, but rather it has another big project related to the re-organization of the region.”

He added: “Turkey, the heirs of the Ottomans, sees itself responsible for the new empire, and for any new Ottoman project which has become fictional, as it fancies in this time to establish this empire again.”

The topic is larger than north and east Syria, and Turkey's goal is the Arab world

Ahmed al-Derzi said that Turkey uses all excuses to expand in the region, not only in the north and east of Syria, Idlib and Jarabulus. He said: "The issue is much greater than that. Turkey is expanding in Libya and will seek to expand towards its east, then Egypt and return to the entire region.”

The Syrian writer and researcher explained that NATO represents the Western bloc completely and is led by the United States of America which is now living a very deep stage of concern, and this concern is linked, as Macron expressed, to the decline of Western domination that lasted for 200 years, and until now, it is under threats and the great rise of China’s alliance with Russia and Iran mainly.

Turkey's targeting of northern and eastern Syria comes after Saleh Muslim rejected the Turkish invasion projects

Ahmed al-Derzi added: “The attacks launched by Turkey now target all parties.” During his speech, al-Derzi mentioned Turkey's offer to Saleh Muslim and said: “Turkey has asked Saleh Muslim to ally with it, and to secure federalism for the Kurds in northern Syria on condition of being under the Turkish sponsorship , and this is what Saleh Muslim refused; therefore, the Turks turned against them.”

Whoever does not accept Turkey's projects is directly targeted

He added: “We know that there is the Kurdish National Council which is an essential part of the Syrian opposition coalition which is subject to Ankara and its orientations. The issue is clearly and explicitly related to the Kurds’ position on the Turkish project, so the Kurds who line up with Turkey in its project will be its tools and be under its protection, while the Kurds who do not accept dividing the Syrian state and do not accept the Turkish project, they are in a position of hostility, just like other parties.”

As for the role of the Arab countries in facing Turkey, the Syrian researcher confirmed that the Arab countries in general are divided among themselves regarding the issue of facing Turkey, and the vast majority of these countries want to confront Turkey, but they cannot.

Arabs know that Damascus is capable of confronting Turkey, especially its alliance with Iran and Russia

Ahmed al-Derzi pointed out that there are complications in the regional scene, these complications are the result of the differences in conflicts among the regional powers. "The Arabs know that Damascus is really able to confront Turkey, especially its alliance with Iran and Russia, but they do not want Iran on this site and they want Russia to completely substitute for it," he added.

The Arabs cannot play their actual role, and the reason lies with the United States

The Syrian writer and researcher Ahmed al-Derzi revealed that the decision of the Arab countries is up to the United States of America which orders them the level of support, its extent, its quality and its limits, and therefore it is not possible to rely on the positions of the Arab countries because in the end, most of these countries take their decisions from the United States of America which has been now in sensitive site as a result of the internal division within it on the one hand and the result of the change in the global mood towards it, the escalation of the three mentioned countries and their impact on the possibility of the United States continuing even in West Asia, and this is what McKinsey described last week when he described this West (West Asia) as a Wild West.

D.H

ANHA