Politician: Turkish-Russian agreement is truce doomed to failure

SHEVIN HASAN – NESRIN ALI / AL-HASAKAH

A member of the Central Committee of the Kurdish Leftist Party in Syria, Aziz Ahmo, discussed the events in Idlib and the Turkish-Russian agreement around them. He said at the beginning of his speech that "after the assembling armed gangs and civilians of the coalition in Idlib, Russia and the regime set their eyes on Idlib to get rid of such gangs as Jabhit al-Nusra " Tahrir al-Sham " and other mercenary gangs. "

He explained that the situation in Idlib entered a new stage after the meeting held between Russia and Turkey in Sochi, which stressed on finding a solution to the situation in Idlib and getting rid of the "terrorist" gangs, "but after the reactions that emerged from the European countries and America, Russia and Turkey had held a meeting where these countries threatened the regime in the case of using the chemical in Idlib because it will commit massacres against civilians, or make any demographic change in the region in which military operation occurs.

The agreement is a truce and will fail like previous ones

He described the agreement between the Turkish occupation and the Russian regime as a "truce," as a temporary agreement between the two parties to put a temporary solution to the situation desired by both the Russian and Syrian regimes to manage the area, "but previous agreements between Russia, Turkey and Iran were to establish a De-escalation areas, but all the parties did not abide by the agreements issued by Astana meeting. "

The absence of Iran was an agreement

Ahmo pointed out that the meeting between Russia and Turkey with the absence of Iran, may have been agreements between Iran and Turkey, "because there was an agreement in the entry the Iranian forces to Kirkuk in exchange for Turkey to Afrin, the mercenaries present in Afrin are the people of the Turkish state, Turkey moves them as they want and uses them to achieve their political and military interests and hit the democratic project in Rojava and North Syria.

He pointed out that America stood by the Turkish occupation against the Russians to prevent it from buying weapons, so it tried to threaten the Syrian regime if it used chemical weapons.

"Syria has entered the division stage, some areas are controlled by the regime and areas controlled by the Turkish occupation with its mercenaries. If the agreement remains as it is, Syria will face a systematic division," Ahmo said.

"If the battle of Idlib is resolved in favor of the regime and Russia and Turkey emerges from Idlib, the Syrian future will not be so easy, because Syria will not return to its former era as a chauvinist state, and it does not recognize the rights of its components. Syria will head towards decentralization and pluralism in where all components live in dignity.

Russia wants to get Iran out

In his opinion, Russia's goal of agreeing with the Turkish occupation is to restrain Iran's role in Syria.

"The agreements between Turkey, Russia and Iran are temporary, because Shiite Iran and Sunni Turkey have not agreed since the battle of Jaldiran since 1514 between the Ottomans and the Safawin, Turkey is trying to lead the Sunni Islamic world and Iran is trying to lead the Shiite Islamic world, these sectarian differences will contain fundamental differences between the two parties, so we will see many political changes from time to time between all the parties on Syrian territories. "

H/S

ANHA