Salha: Turkey would not cut relationship with Russian for Syrian people

The writer and academician from Swaida professor Mahib Salha noted that every time the Turkish party conspired with the Russian, they benefit at the expense of the parties of the Syrian people, saying that this time in Idlib, things will not reach between the two to extremes because they understand the importance of relations between them, especially economically speaking, and Syria will not be subject to disagreement and separation between them as long as they can share Influence and interests

Salha: Turkey would not cut relationship with Russian for Syrian people
2 August, 2018   08:23

NAJBIR OSMAN /NEWS DESK

The writer and academician Mahib Salha said "If international negotiations do not fruit understandings, this terrorism will continue to exercise its function in the south of Syria from the Syrian Badia and in the north Idlib will turn to what is like Torabora in Afghanistan and the use of terrorism by regional countries and international intelligence agencies to pass its interests at the expense of Syrian blood."

This came during an interview by Hawar news agency (ANHA) with the writer and academician from Swaida professor Mahib Salha about developments in southern Syria in conjunction with the Syrian regime's readiness to launch a campaign against the province of Idlib.

The dialogue is as follows:

How do you evaluate the latest developments in southern Syria?

The Syrian issue may seem to be over, but the political process will be much more complicated than the seven-year military operations that have had a lot of hit-and-run between all the warring parties. The exterior intervention turned over the table guided by agreements and understandings of Astana with his partners in direct military intervention by Iran and Turkey under the close supervision of the largest US interlocutor and behind the curtain Israel.

De-Escalation areas emanating from Astana were temporary areas for the stage needed by the interlocutors to arrange their situation for the next stage of political nature. Since the surrender of Aleppo to the Russian by Turkish complicity in exchange for Jarablus, Azaz and al-Bab and entry of Turkish troops to the north-west and even the delivery of eastern al-Ghouta against Afrin to hand over the southern region in return for the removal of Iran in preparation for demanding the exit from all Syria. The brutal attack launched by Islamic State's gangs against Syrian civilians from the northern and eastern countryside of Jabal al-Arab, adjacent to the Syrian desert, where (IS) were sent to Western al-Qalamoun, al-Yarmouk camp and al-Hajar al-Aswad with the air-conditioned buses, accompanied by security and military from the regime and Hezbollah in the context of the international conflict on the southern region and Jabal Al-Arab specifically, especially between Israel and Iran, a Russian message was also to be delivered to the people of the mountain; to hand over arms and to enlist children in compulsory military service and reserve as a human reservoir for the next war prepared by the regime and its allies in Idlib

What would be the position of Turkey if the regime launched a campaign against Idlib?

At the same time, Turkey's message came to Russia, which was named the white paper to open a bazaar between them around Idlib, whereby Turkey would receive heavy and medium weapons, form a national army of factions gathered in Idlib, enter the Syrian state institutions and manage the areas with local councils. East Euphrates Region, which is sponsored and supported by USA Turkish newspaper Yeni Shafak also reported on Russian-Turkish talks to hand over Aleppo to Turkey and annex it to Turkey's sphere of influence. The choice of a political option in the face of the military option will not be as easy as in the eastern al-Ghouta and the southern region where in Idlib 3.5 million people and more than two hundred thousand fighters supported by a regional country is important as Turkey is not for this option of opportunity unless Turkey gave up Idlib as an operation room of the Mukk of the southern region, but this concession has a price that Turkey wants Russia to pay in the Syrian northwest and norther east and at the expense of the Syrian Kurds.

Every time the Turkish complies with the Russian, the price will be taken at the expense of the Syrian people. This time in Idlib, the two sides will not reach a breaking point. The two sides recognize the importance of their relations, especially the economic ones, and Syria will not be subject to disagreement and division between them. Syria, especially what Turkey got from Russia in Syria was not dreamed of obtaining it from the US, and perhaps even consolidate cooperation between the two countries more in the north-west to Idlib and the northern countryside of Hama and the northern countryside of Lattakia in return for the support of Syria, If the international consensus, whether in the north of Syria between the US, Russian and Turkish or in the South between the Americans, Russians, Israelis and Iranians, the international terrorism in Syria is represented by Daesh and Jabhit al-Nusra  and some other Islamic factions will be around the corner of the end or move to another place to play with?

(T/S)

ANHA