Samer Kebro: Military solution rejected to people, solution lies in dialogue  

The Syrian-Syrian dialogue is considered one of the most important topics on the Syrian scene. As a result of external and regional interventions in the Syrian situation, there are no indications to solve the Syrian crisis, and the Syrians confirm that the only solution is the Syrian dialogue only.

Despite the calls sent by the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria which include the necessity of resolving the Syrian crisis away from external interferences, especially in the face of the efforts of the dominant forces in the region which are trying to implement their agendas and plans at the expense of the Syrian people and blood.

What constitutes an obstacle to resolving the Syrian crisis is the efforts of the Syrian regime to insist on maintaining its previous structure, in addition to the link between the so-called opposition and the Brotherhood project that Turkey is trying to implement in the region, but despite this, there are some democratic national oppositions that see in the Syrian north a model for resolving the crisis.

The official of al-Jazeera branch of the Future Syria Party Samer Kebro pointed out that one of the reasons for not resolving the Syrian crisis is "the wrong management" of the conflict in Syria, and he continued: "There is no rational policy aims at resolving the conflict, but rather its goal is to prolong the conflict and ditch the parties around its agendas. Unfortunately, there is no real will for solution."

 ‘Military solution is rejected’

Samer Kebro pointed out that whoever wants the solution in Syria must sit at the negotiating table and put forward their positions, opinions and ideas, but when each side ditches behind its agenda then only the military solution remains, and this solution is rejected by the Syrian people. There is no absolute solution to the Syrian crisis except the Syrian-Syrian dialogue because it carries the meanings of respect, appreciation and the sides’ recognition of each other.

Samer Kebro continued his speech saying: "When we say dialogue, there is a table on which negotiators sit and recognize each other and their role with each party accepting what the other party proposes and discusses. As long as there are Syrian parties, these parties are obligated to carry in the meanings of their policies the dialogue, of course if they want the interest for the Syrian people and the solution for the Syrian dilemma."

‘No dialogue is existed, there is veto’

Kebro explained that ditching the parties behind their agendas is not a solution, and there is no real will even from the international community. Astana was a conflict management, Geneva is absent. He continued: "In fact, there is no real dialogue until now, there is a veto with the participation of many parties. All this is an insult to the Syrian people. The parties on the dialogue table are supposed to accept the dialogue."

He added: "More than 30 percent of the Syrian people are absent from the constitutional committee, and it is indicated that it does not carry respect for the Syrian components. Since ten years, we have suffered from the exclusion policy which is the biggest problem. This dilemma must be solved by the United Nations.".

The official of the Future Syria Party, al-Jazeera branch, confirmed that whoever pay the bill for conflicts and blood are the Syrian people. They are whoever fall and the ones that are still falling into cases of disability and wounds, and the other parties invest their money in the Syrian conflict. The external parties benefited from the conflict among them those who sold their guns, or solved their internal problems, or ends the extremists by sending them to Syria, except for the Syrian people who are the biggest loser. The cities and villages have been destroyed, so there is the responsibility of all the Syrian parties to sit at the dialogue table if they want good for the Syrian people."

Samer Kebro said: "I call for the wise and the intellectuals from all sides to look with mercy for this oppressed people, and consider the history of Syria, its people and its future. The interest of the country and the people lies in the dialogue, and they should put pressure on the international parties that are still putting veto after another to solve the crisis."

He concluded: "I wish the solution to the Syrian people and the end to the conflict. The great powers disputed over our lands and the Syrian people must learn from what happened, and the real lesson is dialogue. With dialogue all problems are solved."

ANHA