We saw together the nature of the Syrian crisis events that sparked controversy about the course of the crisis, which is mainly due to the demands of the Syrian people to change the mechanism of governance in Syria, especially where there are points where the crisis broke out and continued demands during the stages of the revolution as Dara and Idlib in particular and a section of eastern neighborhoods of Aleppo and other parts of Syria.
The question now is, what will be the fate of the Idlib area, which is controlled by mercenary gangs whose names are different? This question is posed by everyone, if they think about the fate of this area.
In a look to the tragic situation in Afrin of the killing, kidnapping, torture and suppression of freedoms after its occupation, we note the great contradiction in the goals of the states that drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Idlib the Syrian province has become a gathering point for all mercenaries and terrorists of European and Asian origin. The AKP authorities brought them to Syria as its crisis began, to use them to achieve their objectives and restore their Ottoman glory. But it seems that Turkey will not easily abandon these terrorists while talking about launching a military operation in Idlib.
Turkey has always sought to keep Manbij city under the control of IS mercenaries, those who turned it into their military capital and were planning attacks in Syria, Iraq and Europe as well. However, the people of the Syrian north liberated this city, which is now a model for freedom, democracy and political management, and thus becomes a point of balance for all regional and international forces.
A map of the Ottoman Empire appeared in Jarablus city in North Syria, which was occupied by the Turkish occupation army. What is the reason for the appearance of the map in the Syrian territories in light of the denial of the Turkish state to restore Ottoman dreams?
